For those who hide under the comfortable cloak of anti-Zionism.

Do you know that that cloak of yours has already hidden a lot of things? He is full of injustices. And he drags a legion of massacred people. Do you know that there is a list of little hiding places where your arguments are reserved for selected causes? Do you know that your group and those who support your agenda against Israel can no longer hide that being against the only Jewish state in the world is being against the security of Jews in the world? That there is a very serious moral contradiction in taking a stand against the Jews and supporting those who want their annihilation?

No one can say that your alignment is inconsistent. Together they hid the omission of feminists when on October 7th, yes, just now, when all organizations in the world were silent in the face of the atrocities of a sexual nature committed against Jews and non-Jews in Israel. Together, they also decided to choose terms that they know do not reveal reality, such as, for example, ignoring historical issues – exactly the opposite of colonialism, the opposite of apartheid — and promoting a revisionism that is both irresponsible and of dubious intellectual accuracy.

Their alignment is coherent when they express support for bloodthirsty autocracies, violent dictatorships, misogynistic theocracies and homophobic regimes. Its alignment is revealed when it reveals selective intolerance against a country that needs to defend itself from systematic terrorist attacks. And finally your alignment becomes transparent when you choose to take a barbaric stance against the values of democracy and civilized life.

Now do you understand? It became clear that the fight against anti-Semitism comes up against a fundamental clause of ignorance: its desire to elevate dogmas to the status of truth. That your attachment to slogans outweighs your desire to search for truth. Everything that is said will be insufficient, do you know why? How else could we believe your false assertions? That the victim deserves to be embarrassed by the attackers. Contemptuous aggressors, who openly state that they would do it all over again. “They would do it all again.” Yes, that was the phrase. We need diplomacy, but first some forcefulness is needed when the narrative replaces not only the facts, but seeks to erase all honest arguments.

I don’t need to prove it to you, mathematics would do it if it respected basic arithmetic procedures: there is no genocide, much less genocidal intention when a population grows exponentially, as is the case with the Palestinian population in Gaza and in the territories controlled by the Palestinian authority. On the other hand, where are the almost 1 million Jews expelled from Arab countries with an Islamic majority? Where are? Oh, wouldn’t you know for sure? Well, they are there in Israel, the only refuge they have left. But arguments don’t seduce you, do they?

You prefer to call humanity’s archenemies combatants. It was you who named those who immolate children alive and burn people in their homes “resistance.” It was his choice to call apartheid a state that is home to 25% of Israeli Arabs, Druze and other ethnicities and who hold administrative and non-administrative positions in parliament, universities and the high court of Israel. But all that doesn’t concern you, does it?

You tell me that you have another perspective: it’s all a question of ideology.

But now I can no longer delay, answer: where is your perspective of freedom?

What is democracy for you? Who knows, at night, when there are no witnesses, you can admit that your theses are ex officio, that is, all you need is for you and those you influence to believe in them. In other words, your theses do not need proof, neither empirical nor intellectual: you just need to endorse them so that by magic you can elevate them to the level of truth. Of absolute truth. And then you forget about dialectics. And there is no memory to remember that there is always room for a contradiction, right? I won’t be the one to tell you the name of this type of intellectual conduct, but there is an article in the penal code that perfectly describes the infraction, it is in the field of ethics, but it borders on the criminal field.

And what about us? We will continue on the path of, together with humanity, building a just and even ephemeral peace, which builds links based on values, under a fraternity that is at the root of the Mosaic code, one that prioritizes internal change in subjects over arbitrary revolutions.

The problem with the disinformation that you, your assistants and voluntary and involuntary collaborators promote against the Jews and Israel, Israel and the Jews, no matter the order, is that you start to believe in the effectiveness of your deception techniques. Perhaps you still don’t know that there is another method that detects all the traces that you have been trying to camouflage: in the evidentiary paradigm there is always a historical path that can lead to the clarification of the evidence. There is always a slip-up, a mistake that reveals how those who hate Jews, — like so many others submerged by the rubble of history — forget to bury the evidence that will later unmask their racist alibis.

That will make him naked in front of all his wrathful impetus.

Which clarifies once and for all who is the persecuted and who is, in fact, the persecutor.

Well, Gleise, the mantle has fallen.